@rosi-shapeblue Can you please review if this fixes the issue. Thanks.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 15.18%. Comparing base (714b04e) to head (1215190).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on 4.19.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              4.19   #11237       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     4.28%   15.18%   +10.89%     
- Complexity       0    11365    +11365     
============================================
  Files          372     5415     +5043     
  Lines        29746   475901   +446155     
  Branches      5230    58097    +52867     
============================================
+ Hits          1274    72252    +70978     
- Misses       28327   395564   +367237     
- Partials       145     8085     +7940     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@blueorangutan ui

@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/11237 (QA-JID-672)

@Pearl1594 , I could not fine domain on the add compute offering modal, but then

so I think there are more to do

@Pearl1594 , I could not fine domain on the add compute offering modal, but then

so I think there are more to do

Thanks Daan. I've addressed it at other places.
Regarding domain dropdown menu - that is visible when public field is unchecked.

@blueorangutan ui

@Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

UI build: ✔️
Live QA URL: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/simulator/pr/11237 (QA-JID-673)

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

looks great @Pearl1594 and I think we can merge as is, but I also found some select fields in the add backup offering that do not move with the parent when scrolling.
(sorry for my diligence)
I think a search for a-select on teh whole ui project makes sense. I wonder why this behavior is not default in ant3d.

@Pearl1594 I think this will be needed across UI if we want consistent behaviour. Maybe we need to create a new custom select component which enforces this behaviour. For starters, if we want to change it in just the offering forms, that is fine too.

I agree @shwstppr , merging this is a good start but enforcing behaviour with a systemwide component makes sense.

I agree as well. I think that's a better way to move ahead. Thanks.